CRIES OF SILENCE- DEVIANCE & POWER
5. Refinement Profiling and cross examining, with geographical profiling, behavioural links and victim profile updates.
Please note. I am not accusing anyone of anything. I am investing patterns and placing dour the evidence as I see it, abused on public information.
GEOGRAPHICAL PROFILING, BEHAVIOURAL LINKS, VICTIM UPDATES
No investigation gets everything right the first time. The strings on a conspiracy board are not fixed. They shift, twist and adapt as new information comes to light. Some leads strengthen; others fall away. Every pin has to be questioned, every link re-examined. As the evidence deepens, so too must the analysis.
In this section, we take a second look at what we already know. We refine the suspect profile based on new public witness accounts, particularly Aljoscha Quooss’ recent confirmations.
We also return to the geographic profiling. This man does not just exist in one place. He moves between known creative zones, from the VIP bars and literary venues of George Street in Edinburgh to the high-rise flats and cultural pockets of Inner London, such as Soho and Camden. These are not random locations. These are carefully chosen environments where power can be exercised quietly and where access to vulnerable talent is built into the surroundings.
This section is about precision. It is about pattern recognition, timing, location, movement and behaviour. It is about laying the threads back down and seeing what the map looks like now.
Let’s begin.
WHY IS M.W. WOLF CONCERNED WITH THIS- POWER AND PAGES.
I did not step into this investigation by chance. I was pulled in by patterns. Familiar ones. The same kind of manipulation I have seen before, not just in stories of abuse, but in how power works across industries, including my own.
I’ve spent years in the creative trenches. As a writer. As a veteran. As someone who has seen what happens when power is unchecked and access becomes currency. I’ve fought copyright theft, idea laundering, and the stripping of creative labour by major companies. I’ve seen how IP is stolen from the vulnerable. I’ve seen how stories are warped. How silence is bought. How the industry protects its own. I’ve seen how these predators prey. How justice systems we turn to for help, do fuck all about it.
When I saw Richard Gadd’s story, I recognised it immediately. Not just as a one-off, but as a symptom. When Aljoscha came forward, I saw it again. Different name, same blueprint. And Levi Davis, yet another example of a young man lost in a system that knows how to chew people up and throw them away. But Levi’s story is even darker.
We’ve seen the same patterns, same behaviours. So many “Postmodern Predators” offending and often getting away with it. And the ones that are eventually exposed, are just the tip of the very dark iceberg. Some of these alleged abusers, with many allegations made against them, and perhaps a shopping trolley of damage behind them before they are exposed, are obvious in hindsight, like Jimmy Savile. Others are never suspected until they are ousted, then they go off sick to protect themselves, batten down the hatches and victim blame.
Then we have the none-sexual abusers, those who abuse positions of power and influence and the work of others who they feel they can spit down at, which is often working class people who don’t appear to overstate allegiance to the fake political stance used to pretend that they care about people and their sufferings.
This of course, is all kept to the gossip of the witches and warlocks gatherings where they brag about stealing from, and Rohypnol-izing, aspiring talent who it’s ok to abuse because they don’t overtly seem to fit the political and cultural fix and fit of the moment.
This played out in public in June 2024, when KT Literary, a Colorado-based literary agency, became the centre of a controversy involving one of its agents, Hilary Harwell. Harwell was fired after she made a controversial public statement on Twitter about a query she had received. She basically stated that she didn’t want the person but wanted someone else to write the book for her, which was seen as a breach of confidentiality and unethical by other agents and authors.
But I kind of feel for Hilary Harwell, she was trying to fit into what is a well-known, and proliferating, abuse of queries. This abusive behaviour and mistreatment of work is widespread in the industry. This was Harwell proverbially saying, “look, I’m one of the gang.” Yet she did it in plain sight, which is a big no no in these filthy circles of abuse.
Guess who was quick to condemn the behaviour? Yeah, Jonny Sticky-Fingers Geller was on it like boom sonic. Jonny stated that this was unacceptable, and he would never do this, whilst also “Allegedly” selling my work to some of the biggest names in their individual industries. The “Mega” agent with his nose in everything, who all the biggest names go to for one time book deals for unknown, perhaps tax, reasons.
Oh and at the same time that my trauma writing was ““Allegedly” being repeatedly molested by sticky-fingers, CBG sold to United Talent Agency, and together they had a monopoly over the talent cast for Arcane by Riot Games, which is 99% stolen from M.W. Wolf’s Bloodborg: The Harvest manuscript. All but the final Jinx rocket scene. If this isn’t fraud, Jonny’s not a Jew. Oh and whilst we are at it, in his book, Yes, But is it good for the Jews?, Jonny Geller wrote that Harvey Weinstein is a “Nice Jewish boy,” in a section about Jews being good to marry. He called Weinstein “Nice Jewish boy” directly after writing, “Not for the sensitive, as he is known for his huge temper… and shall we say “Focus”.” In hindsight, we can deliberate on what Weinstein’s “Focus” meant. Was this a sleazy inside joke?
Of course it was, because sexual abuse is an inside joke to people like this. Hence why we need the likes of the Me Too movements, brave victims and ballsy independent investigative journalists investigations to expose these criminals.
In Yes, But is it good for the Jews? Jonny fancies himself as a comedian but I do have to point out, that he isn’t the comedian and writer / director suspect that we are on the hunt for in these investigations. I should also point out that, to my knowledge, sticky fingers Gelly Wobble isn’t suspected of sex crimes. Although, the way he molests the work of disabled and disadvantaged writers, it wouldn’t surprise me. When the allegations against Neil Gaiman surfaced, the thing I was most shocked about was, that he wasn’t agented by Geller.
This is about more than sexual abuse. It’s about all kinds of abuse. It’s about industries that run on access and silence. Where predators wear suits and pass themselves off as mentors. Where trauma is hidden behind locked doors and NDA clauses. Where gatekeepers molest both work and flesh.
I am not here to point fingers without care. I am here to map what others have been too scared to. I’m here because I’ve lived too long inside the margins of this industry not to speak up. Because the same people who think it's okay to use bodies think it's okay to use stories, ideas, voices, and lives. And because when you know how power works, truly works, you can no longer look away.
And let me be transparent. I currently have open litigation and investigations against Riot Games, Curtis Brown Group, Felicity Blunt, Jonny Geller, Lisa Jewell, and others. These aren’t just corporate names. They are the tip of the iceberg. The same circles that recycle ideas and work also recycle abuse. The same back rooms where deals are made are often the same places where boundaries are broken. I’ve seen it. I’ve lived it. And I will not be silent.
Rich and powerful agents stealing from the “Slush Pile” to scavenge for “fits” for commissioned work to feed to their “Pet” writers and shark tank writers rooms, have killed the talent and literary industry resulting in over 90% of writers never making a living. And whilst they do it, they complain about the government investments in the creatives, and they spout pseudo-moralistic, self-promoting and condescending nonsense on X and Bluesky denouncing the very same behaviours which they are covertly engaging in, such as IP raping, soliciting and stealing the work of disadvantaged writers. You’ll see that this is a protective behaviour as well as a reliving of the thrill behaviour. The same reasons why serial abusers return to the scenes of their crime, victim blame, or insert themselves into investigations.
These “Mega” agents and their pets go sell the works of disadvantaged and disabled writers, who don’t meet the cultural fit of the moment, to the likes of Riot Games, Marvel, Netflix and Penguin Random House and go on book tours in the US, drinking cocktails and leaving used condoms on the hotel room floors whilst their other halves are at home looking after the children. This need for these abusers to have “Pet” writers has skewed the whole industry where marginalised voices are drowned out to the animal cage of repetitive, monotone, same-same formulaic and psycho-emotionally soulless books and products.
These abusers’ of power and pages of the vulnerable are nearly as bad as the abusers of the flesh of vulnerable aspiring talent, and I suggest that there may be a strong crossover, yet they are protected, thus much of their deviance never comes to light. This protection, explained by M.W. Wolf’s Jungle Gun Phenomena, is the reason these industries are teeming with “Postmodern Predators.” Mass “cultural culling” of these predators and government regulation is necessary to save the industries and to weed out the “Savile Simps.”
The M.W. Wolf catalogue, informed by personal trauma, has been exploited and sold to Netflix, the biggest streaming service in the world. And Marvel, the highest-grossing film franchise in history. And Riot Games, the biggest gaming company in the world. And Penguin Random House, the largest English-language publishing company in the world.
Four of the world’s biggest companies in their domains. And yet, I have never sold a single book, never made a penny and spent over half of my daughter’s financial foundation, my life savings to buy a new home for us, on keeping myself fed and able whilst I write more, fight litigations on both sides of the water, and contact services to see my daughter, despite no allegations that I would or ever have harmed her or her mother.
And whilst I go through this, the darkest period of my life, I see these abusers be crowned as Mega Agents and Kings of Comedy and Queen of Psychological Thriller and other endless hyped up bullshit titles, and even an agents potato-headed husband winning writing awards. It’s disgusting, absolutely revolting. The same self-masturbating circle stealing and abusing with impunity and hyping each other up and passing around the soggy wank rags and baggy to suck on while their victims string-up or deal with extremely damaging psycho-emotional trauma.
And if the victims report their abusers to the police, and they have, there is never enough evidence because they have money, and you don’t. It’s not that the individual officers don’t care. It’s because of the systems which abusers have built to protect them. The judges in the US are politicly driven, and perhaps partial to a bit of coin. And in the UK, working class is a synonym for “We Don’t Care About These People.”
Thus, this investigation is not just research. It’s personal. Very fucking personal. And it’s long overdue. And I am going to blow the lid on many abusers. Starting with the sexual predator of Gadd and Quooss who may or may not be the same man.
WORKING PROFILE OF THE SEXUAL ABUSER OF GADD AND QUOOSS.
Before we begin refining, it is important to summarise where the suspect profile stands so far. Based on survivor accounts, public behaviour, industry knowledge, and mapped movement, the suspect is believed to be a white British man between the ages of fifty and sixty. He is not physically intimidating but psychologically imposing. He has average to slightly overweight build, “dad bod.” He is around five foot seven to five foot ten in height. His clothing style is smart-casual, deliberately unremarkable.
He likely wears glasses and has thinning or greying hair, or he is bald already. His face is forgettable, but his presence is not. He moves with quiet entitlement. Calm, careful, professional. He walks like a man who belongs in every room, even the ones he should not be in. He is based in London, likely Zone 2 during the workweek, with possible ties to a more suburban or semi-rural home just outside the city. North London is more likely than south, given his connection to Soho, Belsize Park and Camden.
He operates within the literary, television, and comedy worlds. He is trusted with development work. He reads scripts, advises on pitches, and gives career feedback. He may also run creative schemes or mentor programmes that attract young writers and performers.
He sends voice notes from green rooms, videos from dressing rooms, and messages from tour circuits. He grooms via mentorship. He flatters talent, builds closeness, and offers access. He targets those who are emotionally and financially vulnerable. His grooming starts with praise, laughter, and opportunity. It ends with boundary-crossing, manipulation, drugs and assault. Victims describe his tone as warm, disarming, fatherly or grandmotherly. But it is a mask.
He is deeply embedded. Protected by others. Possibly connected to organised networks, social clubs, or old institutions. He may use claims of neurodivergence or past trauma to excuse his behaviours. He may tell victims he struggles with social cues. He frames himself as misunderstood. But he plans, profiles, and preys with intention. He has been doing this since at least the early 2000s. 2003 is a year previously suggested.
He is not just in the system. He is the system. That is what makes him dangerous.
VICTIM AGE CORRECTION AND VISUAL MISDIRECTION
One of the first corrections we need to make is age. Aljoscha has now confirmed publicly that he is 35. That is something I originally got wrong. And there is a reason for it. He looks a lot younger. Not just physically, though the big bright blue eyes do play into it, but in his whole presence. There is something childlike about him. Innocent. Open. Vulnerable. A softness. That is exactly why it is easy to misjudge him. And it is also exactly why he was targeted. He has vulnerabilities which he has hinted at in his posts.
Predators do not just look for age. They look for energy. They look for affect. They look for people who still wear their hope on their face. That is what Aljoscha had. Maybe still has, even after everything. And it makes the entire story even darker. Because that childlike quality was not just noticed. It was selected. It was used.
This does not change the victim selection. It cements it. Aljoscha is youthful looking. Richard Gadd was 20 or 21 at the time he met his abuser. So if this is the same man, he is seeking out the youngest, or youngest looking, in the cohort that he can find. This is extremely worrying.
We can expect other victims or partners to be young or youthful looking. We can expect them to have an air of innocence. A childlike presence. We can expect an undercurrent of childish or nostalgic content in the suspect’s public image or comedy. A soft tone. A gentle voice. A kind persona. We can expect a man who presents as safe. The kind of man you would not question. The kind of man who acts like a father. Or a mentor. Or even, as Aljoscha put it, more like a grandmother.
This pattern strengthens the overall profile. Not just in terms of behaviour, but in terms of appearance and affect. It is not about being hidden. It is about appearing harmless. That is the most dangerous camouflage of all. One that even children would be drawn to. Like the Child Catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, summoning the children into the cage with lollipops.
UPDATED PROFILE OF SUSPECT- Dr. Hyde and Jekyll the Child.
We now know the suspect is a known performer, not a family man as previously speculated. He is also openly gay, he met Aljoscha on a dating app and having rewatched episode 4 of Baby Reindeer, the abuser describes himself as a polyamorous pansexual with a taste for the finer things in life. This may have been a joke. Yet it feels like there is a disturbing undercurrent. Like Jonny Geller’s sleezy joke about Harvey Weinstein’s “Focus.” There maybe more in this.
Additionally, in the same episode, the abuser jokes, “It’s hard to yell for help when you are chained to a radiator with a ball gag in your mouth.” Rewatching now, while profiling, there seems to be something telling about this. Something Predatory. Then the Stuff about dancing the amazonian jig is almost polar opposite. Childlike. It’s like Dr. Hyde and Jekyll the Child. All twisted, deviant and perverted. This changes certain aspects of the psychological and lifestyle profile and sharpens our understanding of how he operates and where he hides.
I hate to write it, but this adds additional layers of deviance and power dynamics and begs concerning questions of paedophilia. This concern may resurface as we learn more and as we move into the Levis Davies case.
Aljoscha has posted, “Each time he came out of his so-called bathroom naked, he had not just played children's songs and children's films and children's musicals and made me an outright predator type using them with lots of different motives to choose from. A product over two hundred percent created in children. Because the subtext of it is childlike and innocent, I did not expect what was about to happen.”
Again, this rings alarm bells of some deeper pathology surrounding the kinks of the suspect. With this in mind, the suspect become so much more dangerous. His clothing style, and persona, might also be childlike, silly or playful, perhaps Pantomime like.
I can’t help but think of Michael Jackson. He was allegedly abused as a child and grew up in the spotlight. He never had a real childhood. Because of this, he wasn’t able to mature properly. He became a Puer Aeternus. In Carl Jung's psychology, the "pure child" refers to the archetype of the Puer Aeternus, which translates to "eternal boy”.
Perhaps our suspect also has the psyche of a Puer Aeternus. Perhaps there are reasons he was always fearful as a very young boy. Perhaps he knew he was different. Perhaps he was abused, or from a religious background which meant that he couldn’t be himself or express his real self as a child.
This is all very sad. I feel for that young boy. Yet, it is not ok for that young boy to never grow up and to drug and rape young men to express his psychological and physiological needs.
POLYAMOROUS PANSEXUAL
This statement, made in Baby Reindeer just keeps jumping back up now that I’ve rewatched it. This retelling of events happened in 2010 or 2011. Terms like these were not so readily tossed about back then. This is pre the new wave gender politics period. I mean, I left the British Army in 2011. In the Army you meet people with all kinds of kinks from all walks of life. And I’d never heard of these terms. After the army, between then and 2019 I taught many subjects to teenagers. This new wave of gender politics and the new wave of this kind of terminology re-woken around 2017 with the Bret Weinstein and Evergreen State College incident.
Only in my final few years of teaching, around the same time, were terms like these banded about freely. I suppose you could call me ignorant to them, or you could deduce that this was because they were not popularized until around this period.
A quick google search of Pansexual comedian, throws up Joe Lycett’s name first. Yet he is only 36 years old (born 5 July 1988). This is around the same age as both Gadd and Quooss are now. So we can rule him out.
Additionally, I found a September 25, 2024, interview titled, David Walliams discusses with YOUR EX’s Oliver Hall his bond with his Little Britain co-creator Matt Lucas, their controversies and his love of all things ‘gay’!
In this article, it says, “In a 2013 interview with the Radio Times, Williams suggested he was pansexual but has not talked publicly about his sexuality in detail since.”
I’m not confirming that Williams is Gadd’s abuser. I’m just saying that this article is what I found on google. Williams has discussed his sexuality publicly, often describing his sexuality as “fluid” in interviews. In his autobiography, he acknowledged being attracted to both men and women. His statements suggest he may fall under a broader queer umbrella. His sexual ambiguity, power, and public personas screams someone who would say something like, “I’m polyamorous pansexual with a taste for the finer things in life.”
But did he say this? I don’t know, I’m not suggesting he did. I merely investigating patterns and evidence, NOT making accusations. I mean, I could just as easily imagine his partner in crime (JOKE), Matt Lucus, saying the same thing.
Anyway, on Aljoscha’s TikTok comments people suggested that the guy who groomed him might be David Walliams, and Aljoscha stated that it wasn’t him. So we can safely state that whilst this phrase (polyamorous pansexual) might be telling, David Walliams is not the guy who groomed Aljoscha.
David Walliams Controversies
Although, David Walliams, a prominent British comedian, author of children’s books, a childish persona, and former judge on Britain's Got Talent, has been involved in several controversies over the years.
Walliams has faced criticism for certain comedy sketches, notably the "Hide the Sausage" routine performed during Little Britain live tours. In these sketches, he portrayed a fictional children's entertainer engaging in inappropriate behaviour with teenage boys, including pulling down their trousers and simulating sexual acts. These performances have been condemned for perpetuating harmful stereotypes and for their disturbing content.
The “Hide the Sausage” sketch was part of the Little Britain Live stage shows, which ran between 2005 and 2007 across the UK, Ireland, and Australia.
At the time, this was framed as “outrageous” humour. But in retrospect, many now view it as shockingly inappropriate, especially given growing awareness around grooming culture, power dynamics, and how abuse is often masked in entertainment.
In a 2011 appearance on Chris Moyles' Quiz Night, Walliams made a sexually explicit joke about then-17-year-old Harry Styles, saying, "I'd like to suck his cock." The comment drew complaints and was criticized for normalizing inappropriate behaviour. Walliams was around 40 years old at the time. This, of course, was around the same time as the events of Baby Reindeer, although I am not making any connections.
Walliams hosted the Presidents Club charity dinner in 2018, which was later exposed for widespread sexual harassment of hostesses. Although Walliams claimed he was unaware of the misconduct and left immediately after his set, he faced criticism for his association with the event. Some bookstores removed his books from sale in response.
In January 2020, during breaks in filming Britain's Got Talent, Walliams was recorded making derogatory and sexually explicit comments about contestants. These private conversations were leaked in 2022, leading to public backlash. Walliams apologized, stating the remarks were never intended for broadcast.
Following the leak, Walliams filed a lawsuit against FremantleMedia, the show's production company, alleging misuse of private information and data protection breaches. He claimed the leak caused him psychiatric harm and financial loss. The case was settled amicably in November 2023, with Fremantle apologizing for the distress caused.
Also in 2020, Little Britain and Come Fly With Me were pulled from Netflix and the BBC’s own iPlayer for both Lucas and Walliams’ use of different ‘blackface’ characters. Other characters on Little Britain have also faced backlash and have not aged well at all.
I have to say, I fucking loved Little Britain back in the day, but I don’t remember ever seeing Come Fly With Me. I understand that times change and so does cultural acceptance and toleration of offensive humour.
Just because David Walliams and his partner Matt Lucas have a list of sexually charged controversies and questionable sexual humour towards children, it doesn’t mean they are definitively suspects of sexual abuse.
Edinburgh Festival Fringe- 2003
However, David Walliams does have a longstanding association with the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, particularly during the early stages of his career. Notably, he and Matt Lucas performed at the Assembly Rooms in 1995, a period when they were relatively unknown.
The duo came up on the Edinburgh Festival Fringe circuit but there big brake came in 2003 when Little Britain aired on TV, Financed by the BBC. The British sketch comedy series began as a radio show in 2000 and ran as a television series between 2003 and 2006.
Come to think of it, 2003 is a year we have bouncing around in these investigations. Aljoscha Quooss has previously mentioned this year. Perhaps a coincidence.
BODY TYPE OF SUSPECT
I’m quite happy with most of the profile, but I picked up on something.
Aljoscha Quooss wrote,
“I don't believe for a minute that he is delusional enough to think that I would ever be into over-earnest heterosexual-looking men, who insist on lifting their jumper and flexing for me on cam for 30 seconds- god forbid- I politely declined and left pre-installed cuffs he had tucked under his mattress.”
Why would an aging male of over 50 flex with his jumper lifted? Perhaps he is in great shape, or he has recently lost a lot of weight and he’s proud of his gains.
KINKS
“Pre-installed cuffs he had tucked under his mattress” echoes the chained to a radiator line from Baby Reindeer- “It’s hard to yell for help when you are chained to a radiator with a ball gag in your mouth.”
DRUGS IN GAY COMMUNITIES
I want to make it clear that this is not a dig at gay communities. I’ve taken drugs in the past. I’m just shooting on all avenues to profile and pattern the suspect(s) and these crimes.
Gadd has made it clear that he was given all kinds of hard drugs including GHB before he was raped. Quooss has been unclear on whether he was spiked with drugs, but he has stated that he is sober.
Drug use has been shown to be more prevalent in certain parts of the gay community, particularly in urban centres and specific subcultures. One example is the phenomenon known as “chemsex,” where drugs such as GHB/GBL, crystal meth, and mephedrone are used to enhance or prolong sexual encounters, often in group settings. This behaviour is sometimes linked to attempts to reduce anxiety, escape trauma, or cope with stigma related to sexuality. In some social circles, particularly within nightlife and app-based hookup culture, the use of these substances can become normalized. Chemsex carries serious public health concerns, including a high risk of addiction, overdose, and compromised ability to give or receive consent. It also increases vulnerability to sexually transmitted infections and mental health deterioration. While this is not exclusive to the gay community, the combination of societal pressures, loneliness, and lack of support can make some individuals more susceptible to this form of substance misuse. Cities like London have acknowledged the trend with targeted public health responses.
We know that drugs lower, or even completely inhibit, inhibitions and ability to consent. Thus either knowing or unknowingly giving young men drugs to have either “consensual” or nonconsensual sex with them is wrong. With some drugs, the victims might not even know they were drugged. Even if the abuser didn’t take drugs himself, he clearly used them as a weapon to get what he wanted, which is to say nonconsensual sex. Perhaps he faked taking them himself. It’s reported that Charles Manson faked taking acid so he could control his victims. Perhaps this abuser did the same to Gadd and /or Aljoscha Quooss.
If this is a man who used drugs to attract younger men and to lower their inhibition to do unspoken things to them and others, we might see a string of ex-lovers who left the relationship addicted to drugs and perhaps suffering with the weight of these events.
Additionally, comedians in the public eye, are unlikely to be open about drug use. To the contrary, if the suspect used drugs as a weapon of rape, such as the Gadd case, he is likely to distance himself from these kinds of behaviours, perhaps even publicly stating that he is against drug use and he don’t even drink, to avoid suspicion. Thus we are likely to see people like this as anti-drug or teetotal in their public personas, which as I have covered, are thinly masked vails.
Furthermore, advertisements, agents, publishers and TV companies and other business associates might distance themselves from anyone engaging in these behaviours, so the suspect will likely deny any drug use and perhaps even alcohol use.
This denial and even false resentment is likely to have been publicly claimed even louder in the aftermath of Baby Reindeer. Perhaps news reports have been made just to openly state that, “I don’t do drugs, I don’t even drink.”
REVISITING THE GEOGRAPHICAL PROFILING OF BABY REINDEER
I wanted to revisit the geographical profiling to look at closer chance happenings between Gadd and his abuser. We know that they likely had drinks in a private VIP club on George Street during Edinburgh Festival Fringe of 2010 or 2011.
But could they have bumped into each other before hand?
During August 2010, Gadd debuted at Edinburgh Festival Fringe with All The King's Men. The venue was Espionage, 4, India Buildings, Victoria St, Edinburgh EH1 2EX.
In the same year Gadd also performed solo 6 and Half a 7 at The Argyle and Cellar Bar, 15 - 17 Argyle Pl, Edinburgh EH9 1JJ, which is a mile further out of the core of the festival.
In Baby Reindeer, Gadd is shown solo performing. Thus if this is correct, he would have met his abuser in 2010 as he only performed in a group in 2011.
This performance does not overlap with Gadd's Espionage 21:45 show, which suggests he performed two separate shows on the same days in 2010. It also confirms that Gadd was moving between two venues during the 2010 Fringe: Argyle Place in the south of the city and Espionage in the Old Town, much closer to the city centre and to VIP nightlife areas like George Street. The 6:15 PM slot at Argyle would have allowed plenty of time for networking or attending late events or drinks in town, especially considering his Espionage show began at 9:45 PM.
This strengthens the plausibility that Gadd was regularly circulating through high-traffic creative and nightlife areas, George Street, Espionage, Argyle, Cowgate, during a concentrated three-week window. It also reinforces the opportunity for chance or planned meetings with other creatives or industry figures, including the suspect.
The next year, August 2011, Richard Gadd performed Gadd, Kirk and Winning: Well, This is Awkward... At Bannerman's Bar, 212 Cowgate, Edinburgh EH1 1NQ.
Espionage to Bannerman's Bar is 300 metres walk. These two venues are located in the heart of Edinburgh’s Old Town, just a short walk apart, making spontaneous or planned interactions between performers or industry people during the 2010–2011 Edinburgh Fringe highly plausible.
Practically next door to Bannerman's Bar, is bar 50. Between 30 and 40 metres away. The entrance to both venues are on Cowgate Street, literally in shouting distance. In the image provided, the yellow entrance is Bannerman's Bar and the Red is Bar 50.
Bar 50 is a known networking spot. It is a place where performers go to hang out and try to network after their performances or during days off. It’s not only a venue but a bar and hostel space where many Fringe creatives stay or gather. Thus many chance meetings happen here.
In August 2010, Matt Lucas directed two sketches for the comedy duo 'TilWeLeave, whose show "Stranded" ran at Bar 50 (Venue 27). This is publicly confirmed by comedy.co.uk and corroborated by coverage in Chortle, the UK comedy guide.
The performers in 'TilWeLeave were Kyle Eaton and Craig Gilbert, and the show centred on a comedic travel story about being stuck in Chile, with themes of friendship, loss, and return, framed within a mockumentary format.
Combined with the 'TilWeLeave Bar 50 7:10 PM shows, the geography and timing suggest these individuals were performing within walking distance and with time slots that would allow social overlap. That means in 2010, creatives like Kyle Eaton, Craig Gilbert, and Matt Lucas (who supported them) may have frequented the space even outside their scheduled shows.
Richard Gadd performed every night at 21:45 at Espionage from 5- 29 August 2010.
TilWeLeave performed almost every evening at 19:10 at Bar 50 from 7- 28 August 2010.
Both Had regular daily performances, making them fixtures of the evening circuit. They would have finished their shows by 10:45 PM (Gadd) and by 8:00 PM (‘TilWeLeave). Both were free after 10:45 PM, and they would be moving through the same late-night festival culture, VIP bars, afterparties, networking drinks, etc. Or, the people involved in TilWeLeave, might even have had time to catch the latter half of Gadd’s performance.
These timings do not just allow for an accidental encounter; they support the plausibility of recurring proximity between Gadd and powerful insiders tied to rising acts. This makes VIP bars and George Street circles even more crucial for geographical profiling of the suspect.
Combined with the 'TilWeLeave Bar 50 7:10 PM shows, the geography and timing suggest these individuals were performing within walking distance and with time slots that would allow social overlap.
Lucas’s presence in 2010 at the Fringe is now documented, even if he wasn’t performing himself. His involvement in backstage development aligns with testimony in cases like Richard Gadd’s, where the abuser was described as editing, mentoring, or directing from the shadows rather than being on stage.
Richard Gadd’s solo show, 6 and a Half a 7, began on August 5th, 2010 at The Argyle and ran prior to and during both his second show at Espionage and the comedy group TilWeLeave’s performances at Bar 50. This timeline confirms that Gadd was already performing and present on the ground before the TilWeLeave run began on August 7th, a show that included two sketches directed by Matt Lucas. With Gadd performing twice daily, and all three venues within a manageable walking distance, it’s clear that overlapping paths, shared industry circles, and post-show social scenes would have created opportunities for interaction between performers, scouts, and possible predators. This sequencing places Gadd firmly within the orbit of the VIP and industry circuit during the critical opening stretch of the 2010 Edinburgh Fringe.
Gadd performed twice most days, with only two days off from his Argyle show, August 16- 17, and another possible break on August 23–24 (if he wasn’t performing solo those nights). However, his Espionage show ran continuously throughout the festival, meaning he likely had no full days off. Even on the nights without the earlier show, he still performed at 21:45. So, his schedule was intense, but did allow brief pockets of time earlier in the evening on a few dates.
Richard Gadd began performing his solo show “6 and a Half a 7” on August 5th, 2010, which was earlier than the launch of many other acts, including the ‘TilWeLeave’ show at Bar 50 that began on August 7th. This earlier start places Gadd in Edinburgh during a quieter, more open phase of the festival, when artists, industry professionals, and insiders are often arriving, networking, and settling in. It is during this early window that contact with a predator becomes more plausible. Before the routines and full performance schedules lock in, people are more likely to visit bars, attend mixers, or scout new talent. Gadd, as a newcomer to the scene, would have been seeking mentorship, support, or recognition, making him especially vulnerable to manipulation. If the abuser was indeed connected to another act or group set to perform later in the festival, it makes sense that they would have been active in VIP areas or creative circles from the very beginning, watching and waiting for the right moment to approach.
Thus I believe that Gadd may have met his abuser between the 5th and 7th of August 2010.
I’m not accusing anyone, I’m showing how these events of high profile and successful industry men could have come into contact with Gadd.
UPDATED COMPOSITE SUSPECT PROFILE (BASED ON PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND PATTERN ANALYSIS)
Age & Demographic
The suspect is estimated to be between 50 and 60 years old as of 2025. He is likely white, British, and has been active in the UK creative industry since at least 2003. He operates in major metropolitan areas, with strong ties to both Edinburgh (specifically around the Fringe circuit) and Inner London (notably Soho, Camden, and possibly Belsize Park). He likely became famous for a comedy sketch in 2003.
Physical Traits & Presentation
He is of average height (approximately 5'7"- 5'11") and may be slightly overweight (“dad bod”). Although, he might have recently lost considerable weight of which he is proud of. He likely wears glasses and either has thinning/greying hair or is bald. His style is smart-casual and unremarkable, designed to blend in rather than stand out. Despite his forgettable appearance, he exudes calm confidence and quiet authority, giving the impression he belongs in any room. Given the update, he might sometimes wear childish or pantomime like attire.
Industry Role
He is a Comedian and a performer. He likely oversees or influences creative schemes, mentorships, or script development and might also travel with performers or productions in a backstage capacity.
Behavioural Patterns
Grooming tactics: Establishes trust with younger or vulnerable creatives by offering mentorship, praise, career opportunities, drugs or social access. He flatters and profiles victims over time, often using drugs, emotional vulnerability and financial instability as leverage.
Predatory method: Begins with encouragement, builds rapport through daily contact or feedback, then escalates to boundary violations, potentially involving drugs or alcohol.
Psychological disguise: May present himself as neurodivergent (e.g. “not good with social cues”) or as a survivor of past trauma, or strict religious upbringing, to soften perception and disarm suspicion.
Public persona: He likely projects kindness, humour, and inclusiveness. He may present as non-threatening, even “fatherly” or “grandmotherly,” masking control with warmth. At times, he maybe childlike and even immature or performative in nonperformative settings.
Sexual identity & ambiguity: Openly gay or sexually fluid, possibly describes himself using terms like “pansexual” or “polyamorous”, adding complexity to interpersonal boundaries and consent.
Victim Selection
Targets individuals who are:
Young or youthful looking (regardless of actual age).
Emotionally or economically vulnerable.
Eager for career breakthroughs in comedy, writing, or performance.
Naïve, trusting, or socially isolated.
Away from home or feeling of isolation.
Private settings such as dark private VIP clubs or dating apps.
Damaged or vulnerable younger men.
Both Gadd and Aljoscha Quooss have walm and hopeful blue eyes.
He may have a particular interest in those with a “childlike energy”, described as open-faced, hopeful, or gentle qualities that suggest psychological vulnerability. This has led to speculation about deeper pathologies, including inappropriate associations with youthfulness or regressive psychological traits.
Geographical Profile
Frequently present at Edinburgh Fringe (notably around George Street, Bar 50, Espionage, Bannerman’s Bar, ext.)
Strong links to London creative circles, especially areas associated with arts, theatre, and nightlife (notably Soho, Camden, and possibly Belsize Park).
May have appeared at industry networking events, creative residencies, or private festival VIP spaces.
Travels “on tour,” but not as a performer, more likely in a developmental or managerial capacity.
Subcultural Context
May be linked to underground or fringe performance cultures, LGBTQ+ nightlife, or alternative creative scenes.
Possibly aware of or adjacent to chemsex-associated environments (though not necessarily a user himself, but I suspect he is in secret).
Likely teetotal or publicly anti-drug, possibly to divert suspicion.
Psycho-Social Profile
May exhibit traits of the “Puer Aeternus” archetype: an adult who maintains a childlike identity and refuses to mature psychologically.
Has refined methods of manipulation.
Possibly embedded in legacy creative institutions or elite networks that offer cover and complicity, like as ones we have seen in the past, such as Jimmy Savile.
Summary
He offers opportunity. He opens doors.
Then he closes them behind you.
He truly is a son of a Jungle Gun!
OTHER ALLEGED “POSTMODERN PREDATORS”
Convicted or Admitted Offenders
These individuals have been convicted of, or admitted to, serious sexual or violent offences:
Jimmy Savile of the BBC, sexually abused hundreds of people including disabled children in hospitals.
Huw Edwards, lead presenter of BBC News at Ten, the late evening news programme of BBC Television, from 2003 to 2023, convicted of possessing indecent images of children.
Harvey Weinstein - Convicted of multiple counts of rape and sexual assault. A central figure in the #MeToo movement.
R. Kelly - Convicted of child sexual exploitation, racketeering, and long-term abuse of minors.
Bill Cosby - Convicted (though later overturned on appeal) and faced dozens of sexual assault allegations.
Danny Masterson - Convicted of rape in 2023. Sentenced to 30 years to life.
Jeffrey Epstein - Convicted sex offender; died by suicide while awaiting trial for new charges involving trafficking of minors.
Ghislaine Maxwell - Convicted of aiding Epstein’s trafficking operation, with direct involvement in abuse and grooming.
Ian Watkin- Convicted, sentenced to 35 years for a string of child sex offences including the attempted rape of a baby.
Multiple Public Allegations (Disputed or Under Investigation)
These individuals have faced numerous public accusations, investigations, or civil suits, though some have been acquitted or have not been convicted criminally:
Kevin Spacey - Acquitted in UK court but faced many civil claims and reputational damage.
Sean "P. Diddy" Combs- Facing multiple lawsuits alleging serious abuse and trafficking.
Roger Ailes - Former Fox News head accused of serial sexual harassment; several lawsuits settled before his death in 2017.
Bill O’Reilly - Subject of multiple harassment claims; Fox News paid out settlements totalling tens of millions.
Charlie Rose - Fired after multiple allegations of inappropriate workplace behaviour.
Mark Halperin - Numerous former colleagues accused him of harassment, lost publishing and media deals.
Tavis Smiley - Dropped by PBS after findings of misconduct; denies wrongdoing.
Mario Batali - Faced lawsuits and media exposés; settled claims related to groping and harassment.
Russell Simmons - Accused by more than a dozen women of rape and sexual misconduct; denies all allegations.
Chuck Close - Accused of misconduct by multiple women; said his actions were misinterpreted but later apologised.
Rocco Siffredi - Not convicted of crimes but known for controversial and aggressive conduct in adult film industry.
Allegations, Unverified Claims or Public Scrutiny
These figures have been publicly discussed or criticised in this context but face no known legal action or major media investigations:
Russell Brand - Denies all allegations, subject of ongoing public and media scrutiny.
David Walliams – who got his brake with the BBC - Criticised for past comedic sketches involving inappropriate themes of sex towards teenaged boys, but no criminal allegations.
Neil Gaiman - Public allegations of sexual stuff.
Phillip Schofield- allegations of an inappropriate affair with a young man, who some claim was a child when it began.
Investigated, Not Charged / Cleared
Sir Edward Heath
Lord Janner
Cyril Smith
Lord Bramall
Paul Gambaccini
Lord Brittan
OPERATION YEWTREE AND OTHER OPERATIONS
Operation Yewtree investigated child sex abuse made against public figures.
The BBC has been entangled in numerous sexual abuse allegations, particularly involving prominent figures like Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall. Operation Yewtree, introduced by the Metropolitan Police, investigated these allegations and led to convictions. Additional allegations and investigations have also brought the BBC into further scrutiny, including those involving Rolf Harris and allegations against Gregg Wallace.
Many have alleged that the BBC were an enabler of Jimmy Savile and others, either covering up for them or looking the other way while they committed their heinous crimes.
Major Investigations and Locations
1. Operation Yewtree (2012 - Ongoing)
Location: UK-wide; coordinated by the Metropolitan Police.
Focus: Triggered by posthumous allegations against Jimmy Savile.
Key convictions and suspects:
Jimmy Savile - posthumously linked to over 200 offences.
Rolf Harris - convicted.
Max Clifford - convicted.
Dave Lee Travis - convicted.
Gary Glitter (Paul Gadd) - convicted.
2. Operation Fairbank (2012)
Location: Focus on Westminster and political circles.
Focus: Alleged abuse by senior politicians.
Resulted in: Parallel investigations, including Operation Midland.
3. Operation Midland (2014- 2016)
Location: Dolphin Square, London.
Focus: Alleged paedophile ring involving elite public figures.
Outcome: Closed in 2016. No charges brought.
Notable suspect cleared: Lord Bramall.
4. Investigation into Sir Edward Heath
Location: Conducted by Wiltshire Police.
Focus: Allegations of abuse involving the former Prime Minister.
Outcome: No charges filed.
5. Investigation into Lord Janner
Location: Handled by Leicestershire Police.
Focus: Accusations of child sex abuse.
Outcome: Deemed unfit to stand trial due to dementia; died before legal proceedings concluded.
6. Investigation into Cyril Smith (Former MP)
Location: Greater Manchester and Northamptonshire.
Outcome: Investigation closed due to lack of evidence.
7. BBC Internal Review (Post-Yewtree)
Findings: Jimmy Savile committed widespread abuse during his BBC tenure.
Conducted by: Dame Janet Smith.
8. Investigation into Bishop George Bell
Location: Chichester.
Focus: Posthumous allegations of abuse.
Outcome: Civil claim settled by the Church of England; criticized by historians and MPs.
9. Operation Hydrant (2014 - Ongoing)
National coordination body for non-recent abuse cases involving public figures and institutions.
As of 2015, over 2,000 suspects were identified.
Institutional Failures Identified
BBC
Church of England
UK Parliament (e.g., MPs implicated in Fairbank/Midland)
CONCLUSION
This chapter has deepened and sharpened the composite suspect profile, not to name names, but to trace patterns, geographic, behavioural, psychological, and institutional. Through a process of refinement, witness corroboration, and close re-examination of timelines and locations, we have moved from fragmented testimony to a disturbingly coherent portrait of a predator who is not outside the system but embedded within it.
The suspect is no longer just a shadowy figure. He is visible in plain sight. He is not an anomaly but a function of an ecosystem, one that thrives on silence, proximity to youth, and the camouflage of charm, eccentricity, or false vulnerability. His movements through Edinburgh and London’s creative corridors are not coincidental but strategic. His relationships with his victims are not impulsive but calculated. And the cultural spaces he inhabits are not neutral, they are enabling.
We have seen how individuals like Richard Gadd and Aljoscha Quooss were not just chosen for their physical youthfulness but for their emotional openness, their hopefulness, and their perceived pliability. The grooming techniques, emotional manipulation, drugs, industry access—are not signs of chaos, but signs of design. And when combined with the suspect’s performative persona, public innocence, and private darkness, we begin to see what makes him so dangerous.
The profile, of course, remains a work in progress. But it is no longer vague. And it no longer stands alone. It echoes other cases, other men, other patterns, too many to dismiss. This is why geographical profiling matters. This is why behaviour must be re-analysed in light of new evidence. This is why power must always be examined alongside proximity.
We are not at the end of the investigation. But we are closer than we were. What comes next is the tri-profiling of the Gadd, Quooss, and Levi Davis cases. And with it, we move one step closer to naming the structure, if not the man. And maybe, just maybe, to justice.
M.W. WOLF LTD.
AI GENERATED SKETCH OF SUSPECT (NOT MEANT TO BE FUNNY).
